The World of Idir Eathara
I’m working on a new series of paintings loosely titled “Idir Eathara”. I borrowed the phrase from an Englishman – its Celtic in origin and means the in-between place, specifically referring to geography.
Titles have always been extremely important in my work. They act as a bridge between the visual language and the world of text, conversation and written language. Titles bring viewers to the doorstep of the work. Good ones often open the door as well. Titles come from many sources – bits of conversation, radio interviews, borrowed lines of poetry. They accrue on my phone, under glass on my studio work table, and on scraps that float around my office. I used to have vague anxiety about the disheveled quality of this collection of naming, until I realized that I live with it just like I live with my clothes, food, and all the other ephemeral things that surround daily existence. These things are the concrete grounding of living. Titles (potential and actual) have the same privileges and exercise the same binding capacity. Sometimes they form a work from the moment an idea takes hold. Sometimes they wait to attach themselves. Sometimes they form a sub-series and spawn a lengthy exploration. Always they are idea based, feeling based, concept and intention based. Once in a while I will leave a work untitled; it always feels mute when I do so, as though it’s voice has been incapacitated in some essential way.
There’s a long and delicious history of visual art trying to escape the world of language. It will always be successful in the wild attempts it makes in that regard. And from the poet, Czeslaw Milosz, “Language is the only homeland.” I’m glad he did not qualify which language he meant. We cannot escape the collision of languages – visual and spoken, visual and written. It’s territory we’ve willingly taken on, an edge we balance on. Yet titles offer a breathing space – somewhere between purposeful language and visual language, they expand the in-between territory that every visual artist inherits.
For me, Idir Eathara is the glove-in-hand phenomena where naming works is concerned. It functions perfectly on so many levels regarding these new works. They stem from a piece I made last year, The Great Divide. Idir Eathara points to not only the horizon, which is the inbetween of sky and earth, but also to the inbetween of the physical and spirit world. It calls to mind emotional inbetweens, as well as social, psychological and spiritual ones.
I believe titles are very revealing. They can say much more about an artist than about the work. Artwork truly becomes an independent phenomena once it’s titled and released into the world. It can stand on its own feet. But artists that shrink or shirk the job of titling are more than exposed by their work out in the world. Rauschenberg comes to mind. I think he wanted desperately to be poetic. But his titles undermine his wishes. And often they become sorry examples of a sort of hegemony of titling particular to the ’50′s and ’60′s – phrases and ideas borrowed from some obscure branch of philosophy or Latin, like the knowledge philatelic enthusiasts carry around with them. In the end, titles are like the times that spawn artwork.











